Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Andrei Polukhin's avatar

I like the article and, actually, thanks to you, I have explored Claude. Found it that decent that I have paid for the Pro subscription - my mental health is more important to me than 20 euros a month... it is truly better than ChatGPT in terms of answering more humanely and preserving a more holistic outlook - my psychoanalytic brain always loves to look for "blind spots".

I am undergoing psychoanalysis and even though I have used DeepSeek, ChatGPT and Claude to analyse my patterns and psychological defences, I feel uncomfortable telling my analyst that I use AI ... as if that's a bit shameful. That being said, I find AI superb to analyse your patterns and give a psychological structure outlook if - and only if - you explicitly ask it not to side with you on all your considerations. I really find LLMs too agreeable and while it's beneficial for soothing, sometimes I want direct truth.

You have a point about the need for empathy or its illusion. I believe that a therapist cannot get replaced in this aspect ... it is different to talk with the computer than with a person about some sensitive topic - I can "abstract" the AI, but not a human being, as I never forget that in front of me ... is a human being.

Finally, there are different types of therapy and you cannot practice, for example, EMDR via the chat - because the mechanisms are different from "the talking cure". So replacing a human therapist is impossible for this aspect.

Answer: there is no one-size-fits-all answer. A combination may be nice and AI can progress my therapy (and giving some containerisation for me in difficult periods), but there is a need for empathy, containing shame, some things which are not adequately resolved via "words" only or per se.

1 more comment...

No posts

Ready for more?